Skip to main content

Social Theory and the Analysis of Transactions

by Mariano Croce

pp. 140-158 Issue 4 (2,2) – July-December 2015 ISSN (online): 2539/2239 ISSN (print): 2389-8232 DOI: 10.17450/150209

Abstract

This article discusses a serious objection to social theories that claim opaque mechanisms and hidden forces operate over social actors’ head: they bespeak the theorists’ need to confirm their presuppositions whether they are proven or disproven by the phenomena they focus on. The author first explores the way in which Latour has convincingly unearthed this problem. He then analyzes one of Latour’s primary polemical targets, Bourdieu’s social theory, to show that in reality Bourdieu shared Latour’s concerns. The article does so by exploring the nexus between Wittgenstein’s notion of rule-following and notion of Bourdieu’s habitus. Based on this analysis, the author elaborates on the concept of “transactions”, which draws attention to both the actors’ discursive performances and the semiotic context where they take place. The article concludes by illustrating the theoretical-political consequences of this methodological commitment.

Keywords

Latour, Bourdieu, rule-following, social theory, Wittgenstein
Download the article in PDF Visit Volume’s Index